Shared links first
With two or more competitors, the sites linking to several of them are ranked ahead of everything else. A publisher already covering your category is the strongest signal available.
Not only the publishers linking to your competitors. LinkIntel also searches the open web for the listicles, roundups, guides and industry publications that rank for your topics, then scores every candidate against your project before you spend one email on it.
The initial scan is included with every plan. Discovery never sends email.
Visibility goal
Google rankings and AI citations
Sites that already link to you are removed before scoring. Nothing is sent until you add a prospect to a campaign.
Competitor links tell you where a publisher has already said yes, which makes them the fastest place to start. But they only describe the past, they miss every relevant site your competitors never reached, and once the obvious overlap is used the list runs out. Research that stops there stops growing.
A competitor profile is a fixed set. Work through it and there is nothing new to find until they earn more links.
The roundup published last month, the buyer guide now ranking first, the site accepting contributors today. None of it is in a backlink export.
Assistants cite the comparison pages, lists and guides people actually read. Those pages need to be found on the live web, by topic.
Whichever way a publisher is found, it lands in the same project-wide library, scored on the same scale, with its evidence attached. You compare a competitor link and a page you found on the open web side by side.
Every site that links to a competitor and not to you. With two or more competitors, the sites linking to several of them come first, because a publisher that already covers your whole category is the strongest signal in the set.
Discovery is not limited to your competitors. LinkIntel searches the live web for the listicles, roundups, buyer guides, tutorials and industry publications that already rank for your topics, and treats the exact page it found as evidence.
Bring the publishers you already know. Paste one domain, a full list, or upload a CSV of up to 50 sites per batch. They are scored against the same project brief as everything else, so your list and the research sit on one scale.
Ask for between 1 and 50 new prospects. LinkIntel builds current-year queries from your niche, topics, keywords and geography, reads the live results, and keeps the exact page that surfaced each candidate as evidence, so placement fit is judged on a real relevant page instead of a homepage guess.
Ranked, not scraped
Candidates are ordered by search position, how many separate queries surfaced them, topical evidence, and whether the URL looks like a real article.
Fresh on every run
Each run takes a different research angle. After the full cycle it moves deeper into the results pages, so a repeat request does not return the list you already have.
Publishers only
Search engines, social networks, video platforms, forums, marketplaces, app stores, reference sites and government or academic domains are removed before anything is scored.
Six research angles, rotated
What comes back
Tools listicle
Best-of list for your category
Sector newsletter
Recently updated how-to guide
Specialist publication
Contributor guidelines page
Illustrative. Each row keeps the page that surfaced it as placement evidence.
A gap is only useful if it is true. LinkIntel checks each candidate against your own live backlink profile by exact domain and removes every site that already links to you, before it spends anything on analysis.
With two or more competitors, the sites linking to several of them are ranked ahead of everything else. A publisher already covering your category is the strongest signal available.
The union of every competitor referring domain follows in rank order, so breadth is added without losing the priority of the shared set.
Candidates are verified against your own domain by exact match. A site linking to you from any page drops out, so you never pitch a publisher you already have.
A free Domain Rating check runs first. Only domains that clear your floor go on to paid evidence, metrics and scoring.
Every prospect gets one score from 0 to 100 and a plain match label. Open any row and you see the three components, the reasons behind each one, the confidence, and anything the evaluation could not verify.
Measured, not guessed
Domain Rating, referring domains, total backlinks, domain rank, spam signals and monthly organic and paid traffic estimates.
The site is classified
Editorial publication, tool directory, community, company site or unknown. The type is shown to you and never quietly rewrites the score.
Your rules join the rubric
Domain Rating floors, traffic expectations, target markets and excluded topics become part of the criteria. Change them and a later run refreshes the score.
Domain Rating by Ahrefs.
See the full scoring criteriaOne prospect
Tools listicle
Exact topic overlap, adjacent use cases, shared audience and shared problem context. Not keyword matching.
Domain Rating, referring domains, organic traffic, spam signals and overall authority for the market.
The real page that could carry your link, read from competitor evidence or the page that surfaced the site.
A model explains each component from the evidence. Code owns the weighting, the final number and the match label, so the same evidence always produces the same score.
The point of research is to say no cheaply, so that the emails you do send are worth the publisher reading.
Research fills a library. Outreach starts only when you add a prospect to a campaign and approve the first message. Adding a prospect is not permission to send.
Competitor candidates are checked against your live backlink profile by exact domain before anything is scored, so sites that already link to you drop out of the set.
Your own domain, confirmed competitors, archived rows and everything already in the library are excluded from every later run instead of being rescored.
When there is no page evidence, placement fit stays neutral and the score is marked low confidence with the gap named, rather than turning missing data into a confident no.
Four steps, and the last one is always yours.
One public crawl builds an editable brief: what you sell, your topics, your market, your audience and what makes you different. You correct anything that is wrong.
Google rankings, citations in AI answers, or both. That goal, plus your own rules on Domain Rating, traffic and excluded topics, becomes the rubric every prospect is measured against.
Run competitor gap analysis, ask for more prospects from the open web, or import your own list. Everything lands in one project-wide library with its evidence attached.
Sort by fit, read the reasoning, then choose which publishers enter a campaign with a target page, placement type and budget. Discovery never starts outreach on its own.
LinkIntel does the research and the repetitive work. You keep control of who gets contacted, what is committed, and every payment to a publisher.
Research draws on one monthly capacity meter. Duplicates, sites already in your library, candidates that fail your Domain Rating floor before analysis, and anything that fails to complete are not charged.
How prospects are found, how they are judged, and what happens next.
No. Competitor gap analysis is one of three sources. LinkIntel also searches the open web for listicles, roundups, buyer guides, tutorials, industry publications and contributor pages that rank for your topics, and imports lists you already own. Sites with no competitor link at all are found this way every run.
Start with research
Choose a plan, connect your website, and run the included initial scan. No email leaves LinkIntel until you approve it.